Creativity After AI
Why “Good Enough” Isn’t Good Enough Anymore.
Why “Good Enough” isn’t good enough anymore.
Not long ago, if you needed pretty much any kind of design work, you’d call in an agency. Or a studio. Or even a creative freelancer. Basically, if you were after a brand identity, a campaign, a website or a pitch deck then you’d bring in the professionals.
Because there wasn’t really an alternative. The tools weren’t so accessible. The talent wasn’t so readily available.
Well, that’s all changed.
AI has lowered the barrier for basic briefs. If you need design services in a pinch, then you can spin something up in seconds. It might not be amazing, but it’s passable. And when passable is cheap, fast and everywhere, it starts to feel like it’s good enough.
That’s the important difference.
AI tools are contributing to an increase in self-served design competence. Good design used to be rare. Now it’s everywhere. But when everyone can do “good enough,” the value of ingenuity and creative thought goes up. Because that’s what cuts through.
The weird idea. The moment of tension. The surprising tone of voice. The offbeat reference that somehow works. The original idea that feels uniquely relevant. That’s the stuff AI still can’t fake. Which is why agencies aren’t dying, but the safe ones might be.
We’re not really competing with the machines. We’re competing with sameness.
Over the past few years, a lot of creative shops leaned hard into process. Predictability. Consistency. A clean Figma handoff. There’s nothing wrong with those things. They’re part of the job. But somewhere along the way, a lot of studios stopped acting like creative partners and started acting like creative vendors.
And AI is really good at being a vendor.
So now, the challenge isn’t just to do the work, it’s to do the work in a way that only you could. That means taste. Instinct. Strategy. Boldness. Creative thinking that pushes, not just polishes. We’re not really competing with the machines. We’re competing with sameness.
This isn’t about being anti-AI. It’s a brilliant tool, but it’s a homogenising one. It offers fast, predictable solutions, trained on the past. That means the job of a creative agency is shifting from 'delivering what’s expected' to creating what’s unexpected.
We don’t win by being faster. We win by being more human. More surprising. More original.
So no – AI is not causing the collapse of the creative industry. But it is forcing a recalibration. And for the those willing to step back into bold, conceptual work, this might just be the best brief we’ve had in years.